Soutenance de thèse de BASHARAT Iqra


Titre de thèse

FINDING THE RIGHT BALANCE: EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICAL

STRIKING THE RIGHT BALANCE: EXPLORING THE INTERSECTION OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ETHICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Date

20 novembre 2026 à 14h00

Adresse

IAE Aix-Marseille Chemin de la Quille Puyricard CS 30063 13089 Aix-en-Provence Cedex 2. France., 01

Ecole doctorale

Sciences Economiques et de Gestion d'Aix-Marseille

Specialité

Sciences de Gestion- Aix-Marseille

Etablissement

Aix-Marseille Université

Mots clés

L'INTELLIGENCE ARTIFICIELLE,ENTREPRENEURIAT ÉTHIQUE,PRISE DE DÉCISION ÉTHIQUE,,

Keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE,ETHICAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP,ETHICAL DECISION MAKING,,

Jury

Jury de thèse
Qualité Nom Etablissement
Professeur Mme REYNAUD Emmanuelle Aix Marseille Université
Professeur Mme BELGHIT Anne Goujon IAE Limoges, France
Professeur M. LAURENT Vilanova Université Lumière Lyon 2, France
Professeur Mme WAXIN Marie-France American University of Sharjah, UAE.
Professeur M. VITARI Claudio Aix Marseille Université

Résumé de la thèse

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming entrepreneurial ecosystems by enabling startups to innovate and grow quickly. At the same time, growing ethical concerns related to transparency, accountability, and responsible AI have increased the importance of ethical legitimacy for AI-based companies. Despite growing academic interest, the existing literature remains fragmented and offers a limited understanding of how AI startups communicate their ethical responsibility and how stakeholders interpret ethical signals in contexts of uncertainty. This thesis addresses this gap by examining how AI-related ethical signals influence stakeholder evaluation, investment decisions, and the success of crowdfunding in AI-driven entrepreneurship.
Relying mainly on signal theory, this thesis adopts a multi-method methodological approach composed of three interconnected trials. The first essay conducts a systematic literature review to synthesize research on AI-based startups, ethical practices, ethical certifications, and investor decisions. The second trial mobilizes three experimental studies to examine how third-party ethical certification and voluntary disclosure of ethical information influence willingness to invest in AI startups in the healthcare sector. The results show that third-party ethical certification increases willingness to invest by reducing perceived ethical risk, while voluntary disclosure weakens the credibility of the signal and reduces this willingness to invest. The third essay analyzes AI-related ethical communication through machine learning (ML)-assisted textual analysis of 2,008 AI-related Kickstarter campaigns. The results reveal an inverted U-shaped relationship between the intensity of AI-related ethical language and crowdfunding success: moderate ethical communication improves campaign performance, while excessive ethical reporting leads to stakeholder skepticism. External credibility signals mitigate these negative effects.
This thesis contributes to signal theory by demonstrating that ethical signals are heterogeneous, nonlinear and dependent on signal credibility and external validation. She also contributes to the literature on AI-based entrepreneurship by positing ethical legitimacy as a strategic entrepreneurial resource, influencing stakeholder trust and resource acquisition. Methodologically, the thesis integrates a systematic review of literature, experiments and machine learning-assisted archival analysis in order to examine ethical signals at different levels of entrepreneurial activity. The thesis thus makes theoretical and practical contributions to the understanding of how AI-based startups manage ethical legitimacy challenges in increasingly monitored technological environments.


Thesis resume

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming entrepreneurial ecosystems by enabling startups to innovate and scale rapidly. At the same time, growing ethical concerns surrounding transparency, accountability, and responsible AI have increased the importance of ethical legitimacy for AI-enabled ventures. Despite rising scholarly interest, existing research remains fragmented, with limited understanding of how AI startups communicate their ethical responsibility and how stakeholders interpret ethical signals amid uncertainty. This dissertation addresses this gap by examining how ethical AI signaling shapes stakeholder evaluation, investment decisions, and crowdfunding success in AI-enabled entrepreneurship.
Drawing primarily on signaling theory, the dissertation adopts a multi-method research design comprising three interconnected essays. The first essay conducts a systematic literature review to synthesize research on AI-enabled startups, ethical practices, ethical certifications, and investor decision-making. The second essay employs three experimental studies to examine how third-party ethical certification and voluntary ethical disclosure influence willingness to invest in AI healthcare ventures. The findings show that third-party ethical certification increases willingness to invest by reducing perceived ethical risk, whereas voluntary ethical disclosure weakens the signal's credibility and reduces willingness to invest. The third essay investigates ethical AI communication using Machine Learning (ML)-assisted textual analysis of 2,008 Kickstarter AI campaigns. The findings reveal an inverted-U-shaped relationship between ethical AI language intensity and crowdfunding success, with moderate ethical communication enhancing campaign performance. In contrast, excessive ethical signaling generates stakeholder skepticism. External credibility signals weaken these negative effects.
The dissertation contributes to signaling theory by demonstrating that ethical signals are heterogeneous, nonlinear, and dependent on signal credibility and external validation. It further advances the AI entrepreneurship literature by positioning ethical legitimacy as a strategically important entrepreneurial resource that shapes stakeholder trust and resource acquisition. Methodologically, the dissertation integrates systematic review methods, experiments, and ML-assisted archival analysis to examine ethical signaling across multiple levels of entrepreneurial activity. The dissertation provides theoretical and practical insights into how AI-enabled startups navigate ethical legitimacy challenges in increasingly scrutinized technological environments.